andy ridgeway

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 107 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does anyone here play KoL? #1118660
    andy ridgeway
    Participant

      haha, i remember that site.

      i posted that link on SJ about 4 years ago i think and loads of people got hooked, i got a message from Bird about a year afterwards saying “thanks andy, thanks a bunch!”

      as for the 360, next game i’ll buy i think is Mass Effect, which looks wicked.

      in reply to: Does anyone here play KoL? #1139391
      andy ridgeway
      Participant

        haha, i remember that site.

        i posted that link on SJ about 4 years ago i think and loads of people got hooked, i got a message from Bird about a year afterwards saying “thanks andy, thanks a bunch!”

        as for the 360, next game i’ll buy i think is Mass Effect, which looks wicked.

        in reply to: alright then, you hippy cunts! #1140362
        andy ridgeway
        Participant

          oh yeah, i’ve got loads of nag champa (sp) and some other, horrible, incense, windchimes (in the style of a smiley face of the sun +10 hippie points), 100s of candles, some shiny spinny metal stars that hang off the shed and twist in the breeze in a manner pleasing to me.

          sometimes, i smoke cannabis.

          how am i doing?

          in reply to: alright then, you hippy cunts! #1119617
          andy ridgeway
          Participant

            oh yeah, i’ve got loads of nag champa (sp) and some other, horrible, incense, windchimes (in the style of a smiley face of the sun +10 hippie points), 100s of candles, some shiny spinny metal stars that hang off the shed and twist in the breeze in a manner pleasing to me.

            sometimes, i smoke cannabis.

            how am i doing?

            in reply to: alright then, you hippy cunts! #1140361
            andy ridgeway
            Participant
              General Lighting wrote:
              None – I did think of getting one of those LED colour changing lamps but TBH I’ve got better things to spend my money on like paying my mortgage/bills.

              I’ve only got one flyer on my wall as well, and perhaps a couple of photos from the last few warehouse parties I went to..

              If I want to see flashing lights (hopefully not blue ones though!) I’ll go to a rave..

              are you seriously trying to tell me that you don’t have a single big hippy rug thing attached to your wall, with a big picture of the sun, or a celtic design on it?

              😀

              you’ve changed, general!

              in reply to: alright then, you hippy cunts! #1119616
              andy ridgeway
              Participant
                General Lighting wrote:
                None – I did think of getting one of those LED colour changing lamps but TBH I’ve got better things to spend my money on like paying my mortgage/bills.

                I’ve only got one flyer on my wall as well, and perhaps a couple of photos from the last few warehouse parties I went to..

                If I want to see flashing lights (hopefully not blue ones though!) I’ll go to a rave..

                are you seriously trying to tell me that you don’t have a single big hippy rug thing attached to your wall, with a big picture of the sun, or a celtic design on it?

                😀

                you’ve changed, general!

                in reply to: hammock chillout area #1140316
                andy ridgeway
                Participant

                  re: nailing stuff to trees, you shouldn’t do any damage on a mature tree.

                  you might want to plug the hole you leave when you remove the nail or whatever though, to prevent any disease or infection getting in the wound.

                  definitely don’t use copper nails!

                  in reply to: hammock chillout area #1119572
                  andy ridgeway
                  Participant

                    re: nailing stuff to trees, you shouldn’t do any damage on a mature tree.

                    you might want to plug the hole you leave when you remove the nail or whatever though, to prevent any disease or infection getting in the wound.

                    definitely don’t use copper nails!

                    in reply to: SquatJuice: Harmless or Bitter and Twisted? #1135093
                    andy ridgeway
                    Participant
                      farmerwardy wrote:
                      this is what i mean by bein stuck up!! you understood what it means so why waste about 5 mins of your day bitchin about my grammar.

                      il be spellin and typin shit as i like fanx :weee:

                      you’re talking to an sj regular there mate.

                      @this thread: moan moan fucking moan.

                      if there’s no threads to interest you, start one.

                      yet another post going moanx3 does not interesting reading make.

                      although i think i may have just done that, myself?

                      😀

                      in reply to: SquatJuice: Harmless or Bitter and Twisted? #1114762
                      andy ridgeway
                      Participant
                        farmerwardy wrote:
                        this is what i mean by bein stuck up!! you understood what it means so why waste about 5 mins of your day bitchin about my grammar.

                        il be spellin and typin shit as i like fanx :weee:

                        you’re talking to an sj regular there mate.

                        @this thread: moan moan fucking moan.

                        if there’s no threads to interest you, start one.

                        yet another post going moanx3 does not interesting reading make.

                        although i think i may have just done that, myself?

                        😀

                        in reply to: Charlie Manson #1140337
                        andy ridgeway
                        Participant

                          manson_half.jpg

                          i ask, because i watched the famous 1972 documentary about The Family, last night, and can’t really make my mind up…

                          in reply to: Charlie Manson #1119593
                          andy ridgeway
                          Participant

                            manson_half.jpg

                            i ask, because i watched the famous 1972 documentary about The Family, last night, and can’t really make my mind up…

                            in reply to: Your fave urban slag term #1137906
                            andy ridgeway
                            Participant

                              a kronenbourg

                              ie: 16 from behind, 64 from the front.

                              i would never talk about a lady like that though.

                              in reply to: Your fave urban slag term #1117244
                              andy ridgeway
                              Participant

                                a kronenbourg

                                ie: 16 from behind, 64 from the front.

                                i would never talk about a lady like that though.

                                in reply to: i just had a #1137866
                                andy ridgeway
                                Participant

                                  yeah man, you know when you’re gaping for an hour afterwards:

                                  that’s one banging shit.

                                  in reply to: i just had a #1117204
                                  andy ridgeway
                                  Participant

                                    yeah man, you know when you’re gaping for an hour afterwards:

                                    that’s one banging shit.

                                    in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137694
                                    andy ridgeway
                                    Participant
                                      tilting wrote:
                                      I did really like The Thick Of It though. Couldn’t we cut him a bit of slack? He’s a celeb after all.

                                      How do you come back from this type of thing? Are there agencies willing to take on rebranding a paedo?

                                      Or do you just give up and move to Timbuktoo?

                                      i remember there was some tv awards ceremony shortly after langham’s initial arrest, and The Thick Of It were nominated in some category.

                                      they read out the other 5 shows that were nominated to rapturous applause, but the words The Thick Of It were greeted with utter, stony silence, the camera cut to the cast and crew members who looks shocked and deeply embarrassed.

                                      i wonder if any one had clapped whether they would have been bottled out of the room to shrieks of noncelover!

                                      re: rebuilding your career after something like this, i dunno, pete townsend seems to be doing ok by just Pretending It Never Happened, but if you’ve actually done prison time for it the options seem to be move to thailand, or brazen it out as a celebrity nonce, a la Jonathon King.

                                      there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

                                      but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

                                      does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

                                      in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1117034
                                      andy ridgeway
                                      Participant
                                        tilting wrote:
                                        I did really like The Thick Of It though. Couldn’t we cut him a bit of slack? He’s a celeb after all.

                                        How do you come back from this type of thing? Are there agencies willing to take on rebranding a paedo?

                                        Or do you just give up and move to Timbuktoo?

                                        i remember there was some tv awards ceremony shortly after langham’s initial arrest, and The Thick Of It were nominated in some category.

                                        they read out the other 5 shows that were nominated to rapturous applause, but the words The Thick Of It were greeted with utter, stony silence, the camera cut to the cast and crew members who looks shocked and deeply embarrassed.

                                        i wonder if any one had clapped whether they would have been bottled out of the room to shrieks of noncelover!

                                        re: rebuilding your career after something like this, i dunno, pete townsend seems to be doing ok by just Pretending It Never Happened, but if you’ve actually done prison time for it the options seem to be move to thailand, or brazen it out as a celebrity nonce, a la Jonathon King.

                                        there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

                                        but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

                                        does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

                                        in reply to: SquatJuice: Harmless or Bitter and Twisted? #1135092
                                        andy ridgeway
                                        Participant

                                          in answer to the original question on this thread, squatjuice is in the eye of the beholder.

                                          if you take it too seriously, it might bend your mind or something.

                                          i have seen it mess with peoples’ heads many times 😮

                                          in reply to: SquatJuice: Harmless or Bitter and Twisted? #1114761
                                          andy ridgeway
                                          Participant

                                            in answer to the original question on this thread, squatjuice is in the eye of the beholder.

                                            if you take it too seriously, it might bend your mind or something.

                                            i have seen it mess with peoples’ heads many times 😮

                                            in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137693
                                            andy ridgeway
                                            Participant

                                              well, we got there in the end, gang.

                                              now don’t hang around here waffling, light some torches and rouse the villagers!

                                              >:(

                                              i get off on proxy outrage as much as the next man, i just like to feel it’s well founded, rather than just Murdoch pressing my buttons, getme.

                                              in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1117033
                                              andy ridgeway
                                              Participant

                                                well, we got there in the end, gang.

                                                now don’t hang around here waffling, light some torches and rouse the villagers!

                                                >:(

                                                i get off on proxy outrage as much as the next man, i just like to feel it’s well founded, rather than just Murdoch pressing my buttons, getme.

                                                in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137692
                                                andy ridgeway
                                                Participant
                                                  tilting wrote:
                                                  Level 1 covers “images depicting erotic posing with no sexual activity”.
                                                  Level 2, “sexual activity between children, or solo masturbation by a child”.
                                                  Level 3, “non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children”.
                                                  Level 4, “penetrative sexual activity between children and adults”.
                                                  Level 5, “sadism or bestiality”.

                                                  Langham was found to have all, up to and incl. level 5.

                                                  that’s interesting concerning the levels.

                                                  also, legally speaking, bestiality is on a par with paedophilia isn’t it, ie the Worst Of The Worst Of Porn, even though we’ve all seen it/had a good laugh down the pub about that email of a woman sucking off a horse. you get less of a laugh when talking about russiannoncelord.com, in my experience.

                                                  do you have a link to confirm what you say about langham being a level five virtuapaed?

                                                  we are at paedcon five, this is not a drill?

                                                  in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1117032
                                                  andy ridgeway
                                                  Participant
                                                    tilting wrote:
                                                    Level 1 covers “images depicting erotic posing with no sexual activity”.
                                                    Level 2, “sexual activity between children, or solo masturbation by a child”.
                                                    Level 3, “non-penetrative sexual activity between adults and children”.
                                                    Level 4, “penetrative sexual activity between children and adults”.
                                                    Level 5, “sadism or bestiality”.

                                                    Langham was found to have all, up to and incl. level 5.

                                                    that’s interesting concerning the levels.

                                                    also, legally speaking, bestiality is on a par with paedophilia isn’t it, ie the Worst Of The Worst Of Porn, even though we’ve all seen it/had a good laugh down the pub about that email of a woman sucking off a horse. you get less of a laugh when talking about russiannoncelord.com, in my experience.

                                                    do you have a link to confirm what you say about langham being a level five virtuapaed?

                                                    we are at paedcon five, this is not a drill?

                                                    in reply to: Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn #1137691
                                                    andy ridgeway
                                                    Participant
                                                      Intastella wrote:
                                                      Tell you what Andrew, if you tripped over the shit i saw on one of your mates puters, you would be the first one there with the molotovs, no two ways about it.

                                                      too fucking right i would be.

                                                      don’t misunderstand me, or think that if i’m not rounding up people with pitchforks at the first whisper of the word nonce, that i am a Friend Of The Paedos. i am a parent too, remember.

                                                      the fact that it is such a (rightly) emotive, and appalling subject is the whole reason WHY we MUST be more specific, open and honest in our dealings with this.

                                                      the fact is, you have equated Langham with your friend, who had images of children being fucked, my sole point is that you have no basis to do that, and that this is a very dangerous state of affairs when people with no knowledge of case would certainly be willing to physically attack and even kill someone accused of paedophilia, to general applause.

                                                      you mention that there are “grades” of paedophilia, in law, which is true as i understand it.

                                                      my point is that these are not shared with us, and if they are, the media chooses to obfuscate the issue for their own (imo) obvious motives…

                                                    Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 107 total)